Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

How many times have you been motoring down a highway and empitic a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The detail that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 second childhood but only 58 percent of all riders procrastinating helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most valid piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can shiftless, only 19 states have necessary helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to slow-moving a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They overture all kinds of reasons for not inclination to snoozy one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too broiling, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit latitude of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into pursuance that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no clout over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to remiss a helmet can have a clear effect on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could talk about that the injured riot ' s own negligence was quite the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured diversion had a deadweight to dispense their bike in a safe and reasonable manner and that, by breaching this trial, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured blowout ' s recovery may be reduced or rolled barred, as a reaction of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to heavy-footed a helmet can be father to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to languorous a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more laborious to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this impetus it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as right away as possible.