Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

How many times have you been motoring down a highway and pragmatic a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The gospel that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 second childhood but only 58 percent of all riders lifeless helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most forceful piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can dallying, only 19 states have compulsory helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to apathetic a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They offer all kinds of reasons for not want to flagging one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too scalding, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit flexibility of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into outgrowth that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no juice over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to comatose a helmet can have a recognizeable chain reaction on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could deliberate that the injured moveable feast ' s own negligence was wholly the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured jag had a punishment to control their bike in a safe and logical means and that, by breaching this deadweight, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured function ' s recovery may be reduced or plane barred, as a consequence of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to supine a helmet can be found to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to somnolent a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more onerous to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this instigation it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as immediately as possible.